Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search


comScore Voices


October 2009 Archives

October 6, 2009


comScore CEO Dr. Magid Abraham Accepts AMA's Coveted Parlin Award!

This morning, comScore CEO and co-founder Dr. Magid Abraham accepted the AMA’s 64th annual Charles Coolidge Parlin Marketing Research Award. The Parlin Award is a preeminent national honor awarded to those who have demonstrated “outstanding leadership and sustained impact on advancing the evolving profession of marketing research over an extended period of time.” Past honorees have included such marketing industry luminaries as Peter Drucker, David Ogilvy and Philip Kotler.

Below is the full text of Dr. Abraham’s acceptance speech.

Good Morning!

I would like to thank the Parlin board of governors and the AMA for this great award. I am honored to be chosen and humbled to be counted in the same group as the illustrious past winners.

Let me say a few things about my background. I grew up in Lebanon on a fruit farm. The obvious question is what got me from loading apple crates on the backs of donkeys to a career in Marketing Research of all things. The answer about leaving the donkey line of work is simple: I had greater ambitions than looking at donkey’s behinds! Perhaps the more interesting question is: Why market research and not medicine, science, engineering, finance, law, or any of the myriad of professions more likely to be familiar to a farmer’s son?

Truth be told, I am surprised that this is what I ended up doing. I have always loved Math and Science and was particularly fond of physics. My stated ambition in my high school yearbook was to become a nuclear scientist. As I was about to graduate from college, there was a crisis in the nuclear industry in the aftermath of Three Mile Island. I was no longer sure that becoming a nuclear physicist would guarantee I would not go back to walking behind donkeys. I played it safe and decided to pursue graduate studies in Operations Research at MIT.

The business courses I took in my first year left me with the initial impression that Marketing was just an artsy folksy discipline that I should stay away from, and that the name “Marketing Science” was a stretch at best.

The turning point came when I invited Professor John D. C. Little, who is also a Parlin recipient, to give a seminar to the graduate Operations Research students. John presented his work on using multinomial Logit to predict consumer choice in the coffee category using scanner panel data which was a novelty at the time. I was fascinated that such data actually existed and was seduced by the mathematics involved. In fact, I found the modeling of choice probabilities a bit reminiscent of Quantum Physics. With my interest piqued, I took a summer job at Management Decision Systems, a marketing research company John co-founded. I fell in love and never looked back.

As a data geek, I quickly realized that good data is just as important as good models for answering research questions, if not more so. My first R&D assignment at MDS was to work with Professor Len Lodish from Wharton to develop solutions for evaluating trade promotions by CPG brands. The system we developed, Promoter, was created at a time when the norm for measuring retail sales was bimonthly audit data from AC Nielsen, which was totally inadequate for the task at hand. We ended up primarily using weekly shipment data disaggregated at the key account level.

But I soon realized that nirvana lurked in the shiny laser beams of supermarket scanners which collected sales transactions to consumers in real time. With weekly scanner data, the estimation of incremental sales due to promotions is far simpler, richer and more precise. It enabled us to measure the sales lift generated by different types of promotional tactics such as newspaper ads, end-aisle displays and temporary price reductions.

I quickly focused my energy to help in building a national scanner data source which became IRI’s Infoscan, and adapting the Promoter methodology to measure promotional elasticities on a massive scale, for every product, retail store and weekly period.

Then, in an industry first, we made the elasticity metrics routinely available with sales data. Clients did not need to run a special model to estimate those elasticities. They just read them in their market share reports. We also decomposed market share into two components: Base share, which is the market share a brand would get in the absence of promotions, and incremental share contributed by short term promotional activity. This new paradigm, a staple in the industry today, was very useful in separating the impact of short term tools that brand managers can use to increase sales, from the longer term drivers of brand sales including brand positioning, everyday pricing, advertising and new products.

Along the way, I came to appreciate the importance of research automation. To deliver base and incremental sales, we had to generate over 100 million baseline estimates per week. We simply could not have analysts review the estimation output. It was imperative to build a system that mimics what a smart analyst would do in handling special situations and data exceptions. To this day, people tease me about a 1985 Promoter promotional video where I proudly boasted, only as a 25 year old could, that “Promoter’s experienced eye cannot be fooled”. But that was no idle joke. I was very proud of “Promoter’s experienced eye”. It allowed us to have confidence in data estimated on billions of observations without human supervision.

Market Researchers are typically proud of their analytical acumen. My motto is: “Automate to Dominate”. Automate analytical intelligence to dominate mountains of data. Let silicon do everything that silicon can do, and save your brain cells for creative analysis and insightful communication.

It is almost always the case that end-users of market research information lack the interest, skills or time needed to fully leverage the information we provide them. We are more successful when we simplify, provide easy access, and deliver results in the most useable or actionable form.

I applied this principle in designing another expert system called Sales Partner. Sales organizations recognize that data and insights can be very powerful selling tools. At the same time, salespeople are not data geeks like some of us. They typically do not have the time or the inclination to analyze data and use it in a sales pitch. Sales Partner mimicked the thought process of a clever sales guy and automated the creation of cogent, data driven sales arguments to support a specific sales objective. The system became popular very quickly and was probably one of the most gratifying products I was involved in.

As CEO of comScore I have many of the common CEO responsibilities. However, I am far from being a typical public company CEO. I am frequently happily engrossed in solving many of our core methodological and analytical problems, whether they relate to sampling and weighting methods, predictive models of consumer behavior, reach and frequency models, advertising response models, or, more recently, the development of hybrid measurement methodologies integrating audience projections from a sample of individual panelists with a census of usage measured by web servers.

This hybrid integration is akin to a measurement holy grail combining the benefits of rich granular information from a sample with the accuracy of a census. While conceptually simple, this turns out to be a challenging problem putting to the test the creativity and ingenuity of our best and brightest minds. Personally, I have enjoyed joining the fray and working through the conceptual and mathematical complexity of the solution.

This farmer’s son is fortunate to have had the opportunity to create scalable research data sources and models that are used daily by tens of thousands of users worldwide. But, at the core, he is happy to be, like you, a market researcher.

I think that people in this industry are a special breed. They believe in the power of data analysis which they use as their stock in trade. They frequently set out to exercise this power by starting new companies, and constantly searching for and solving new problems. They are obsessed with modeling consumer behavior, which can be more fickle and less predictable than subatomic particles. This is a profession that values creativity and entrepreneurship. A profession that spawned many pioneers who built the tools needed for marketing success in highly evolved and competitive markets. You certainly can be successful without good marketing research, but you are always more successful with it.

I would not be here without the help of many people who supported me throughout my career. People such as Gian Fulgoni, former CEO of IRI and chairman of comScore, John Malec and Gerry Eskin, co-founders of IRI, Len Lodish my partner on many research projects, Glen Urban and John Little, my PhD dissertation advisor and mentor. I am also thankful for all the people at comScore whose tireless efforts and ingenuity helped build the company to its current success. Finally, my wife, Linda Abraham, who is now comScore’s CMO and was my co-founder at Paragren, who has always been a great sounding board and a reliable source of support and inspiration. I am proud to accept this great award on my and their behalf. Above all, I am especially proud to be part of this noble profession.

Thank you!

October 7, 2009


The Dawn of Hybrid Audience Measurement

This post was originally published at MRWeb.com on October 6, 2009.

It is often said that the Internet is the most measurable medium. This is certainly true of measuring ad impressions and click through rates, which are critical elements of advertising measurement. However, measuring audiences has been far more challenging, particularly in light of the ongoing differences between server logs, which represent a census of usage, and panel based estimates provided by third party companies including comScore. The purpose of hybrid measurement is to derive audience projections that reconcile to census usage counts and deliver the key metrics of unduplicated reach and audience demographics required for media research.

An obvious question is why not use server data alone since it represents a census of usage? Server data accurately measures usage tonnage: page views (PV) and sessions, but its measurement of usage time is inaccurate. Furthermore, unique user counts are primary based on unique cookies. Cookies are well known as a poor surrogate for persons. Multiple users on the same machine are represented by one cookie, whereas a single user using multiple browsers on the same machine or using multiple machines can be represented by multiple cookies. When users delete cookies they get counted multiple times, which can be as often as they visit a site, if they set their browsers to delete their cookies after every session. Finally, there is a problem with machines that reject cookies. In addition, a key requirement for audience measurement is to measure the audience of not just one site, but the unduplicated reach of multiple sites, to enable the evaluation of media plans t spanning multiple sites. Server logs typically record usage of sites owned or operated by a single publisher, and therefore do not allow for cross-site overlap with third party or competitive sites that could be used as part of campaign.

Panel measurement tracks an individual person with known demographics across sites and time without reliance on cookies. Audience reports include demographic composition, unduplicated reach and frequency, and rich segmentation based on behavior such as content consumption or purchasing activity. However, a panel is based on a sample of people and therefore is subject to bias and sampling errors. In particular, it is difficult to represent work usage at large enterprises where IT security policies prohibit the download of panel metering software. Finally, niches sites may be difficult to represent via a panel designed to mirror a mainstream audience.

Hybrid measurement is a solution that combines the best aspects of server side census measurement, and of person based panel measurement. The basic idea is that census measurement provides an actual count of PVs which can be used to anchor audience measures. On the other hand, panels provide rich information on person-level usage and demographics. The combination allows to match the PV counts and to estimate number of unique persons visiting a site or a group of sites, in a manner that reconciles with the census level page views. It offers a ‘one number’ solution that eliminates the inherent conflict in estimates between web analytics and audience measurement reports and allows publishers to focus on building their business rather than argue about metrics.

There is general industry agreement that this the right conceptual approach. However, the devil is always in the details and a number of requirements must be met for this to fulfill industry needs:

  1. Audience counts must reflect people, not machines, browsers or cookies.
  2. Rigorous standards must be used to ensure that a site’s tags fairly represent its audience. Tagging is an error prone process, and care must be exercised to ensure that all pages are tagged, but also that only legitimate pages, those that are actually requested by user, are tagged once and only once in order to prevent rival web sites from gaming the system to boost their audience. Audit safeguards must be systematically deployed to ensure accuracy and fairness across sites.
  3. The hybrid estimation methodology must fundamentally account for the drivers of differences between panel and census pages views include not only differences in unique visitors, but also differences in usage frequency and usage intensity. Just patching census usage metrics and panel unique visitors on the same report is naïve and misleading.

Hybrid measurement can be used to measure all types of digital media where a census count is available. This includes the web, online video, the mobile web, online games, and digital advertising campaigns. It will be also increasingly applicable to TV measurement as census counts of TV usage become readily available from digital set-top boxes. It is the dawn of a true revolution in media measurement.

October 12, 2009


Wharton’s Future of Advertising Project

Last Thursday, I spent a very interesting afternoon at the Wharton Business School as a member of the Global Advisory Board for the “The Future of Advertising Project” (FOA). It was a fun afternoon chatting with the likes of Rishad Tobaccowala (CEO of Denuo), Joe Plummer (former chief knowledge officer at McCann Worldgroup), Penry Price (VP global agency and industry relations at Google) and the other board members.

The FOA initiative was started by Professor Jerry Wind within Wharton’s SEI Center for Advanced Studies in Management with the mission: “to lead the reinvention of the scope, practice and value of advertising”. The FOA kicked off last December with a two-day conference at Wharton where dozens of researchers presented papers to be considered “Empirical Generalizations in Advertising”. I presented comScore’s “Whither the Click?”, which I had co-authored with Empi Morn of comScore. I’m delighted to say that our paper was subsequently chosen to be one of 21 “watertight laws for intelligent advertising decisions” featured in the June 2009 issue of the Journal of Advertising Research.

The FOA project is focused on the many business challenges of the new advertising reality:

  • Highly empowered consumers
  • Greater imperative to engage and entrust audiences
  • Continuously expanding technological advances
  • New insights on message creation and impact
  • Ever-expanding and cannibalizing media models
  • Overly US-centric mindset
  • Plethora of opinion-based assertions
  • Increased pressure for results accountability
  • Old organizational models don’t reflect new realities
  • Compounded by the global financial crisis and recession

The FOA project has been structured with a distinctive approach that encompasses the following elements:

  1. Wharton-led team: independent, trusted, fact-based, relevant, collaborative, actionable, global
  2. Propose a new mental model: Portfolio Orchestration Model
  3. Test, enrich and refine with real world Innovative Case Studies, Experiments, and Empirical Generalizations
  4. Create an engaged community of industry and academic Global Thought Leaders to contribute, comment and reflect on the various experiments and co-create insight content
  5. Empower Marketers via a Multi-Platform Portfolio: YouTube channel, book, eBook, videos, podcasts, online, social media, conferences, consultation, courses.
  6. Recognize Marketer / Agency / Research / Media innovation and excellence with FOA Portfolio Awards

As part of the FOA, a Wharton/Google YouTube marketing channel Fast. Forward. was launched with support from Google during the recent Advertising Week. It is a first-of-its-kind online destination for marketing and advertising that provides actionable insights for more informed decision-making. It takes the form of short 1-3 minute videos featuring thoughts from around the industry and academic worlds and is also intended to be an interactive platform for audience engagement.

In the words of Prof. Jerry Wind: “The idea is that the site will become the place for credible, objective information on marketing and advertising that’s current and most compelling.”

I hope you will take a look at the site. I think you’ll find it well worth your time.

October 14, 2009


Game On! Online Sport Content Grows Around the Globe

Having recently joined comScore from a background steeped in sport, it’s an area close to my heart. Outside of the U.S., I believe that sport Web sites are a rather under-researched component of the sporting world compared to other industries, but there are countless opportunities for the sports industry to continue to grow worldwide. The industry needs to embrace the strength and measurement tools of the Internet. Sport content owners and blue chip brands need to better understand what is working and what isn’t working for them to compete in the quick moving environment of digital content and e-commerce.

Online sport content, e-commerce and social media/networking cover the engagement opportunity basics and have provided the Internet with innovations such as fantasy football branded record-breaking games such as EA’s FIFA 2010. But overall, the category has struggled to “keep up with the Joneses”…the “Joneses” being alternative digital entertainment such as music, video games and social media, and also in terms of measuring advertising effectiveness and engagement. Knowing that a solid research study on the consumption of online sport content would be compelling and tell a useful story, I set off to discover who is consuming sport content online -- globally and regionally -- and in two major sporting markets (the U.S. and the U.K.), and how brands are benefiting from investing in properties appropriate to their needs.

comScore was an official partner of Sports Business 360 last month, where I had the opportunity to present these research findings to a crowd dedicated to the world of sport. As a growing category of online interest, I wanted to also share the findings with readers of our blog, providing a detailed look at the current state of the online sports industry worldwide. A snapshot of the report follows:

Consumption of Sports Content – a Global Overview

  • Time spent on sports sites globally has increased by 25% year-over-year
  • Asia Pacific region represents a third of the global sports content audience
  • Sports sites reach 46% of the North American online population
  • Sports category audiences growing even in developed online markets – 22% annual growth in Europe
  • Consumers of sports content are engaged for 6% longer year-over-year
  • Developing online markets have younger consumers of sports content
  • Males account for 70% of sports content page views worldwide

Leading Sports Destinations

  • Yahoo! Sports has the strongest global presence, reaching 5.2% of the global online audience
  • But site reach does not equal engagement – more time is spent on ESPN
  • The European online sports content market is fragmented, with the leading site reaching 7.4 million people
  • ‘Local’ branded sport sites dominate markets in the Middle East/Africa and Latin America

Consumption of Sports Content – U.K. vs. U.S.

  • The percentage of total Internet users that visit sports sites are similar in the U.S. and U.K., but the number of visits to sports sites in America make up a smaller percentage of all web site visits. Additionally, the average time spent per visit on sports sites is longer in the U.S. (approximately 8 minutes), while the average U.K. visit was about 6 minutes.
  • The two markets have different age compositions, with 25-54 year olds over-represented in the U.K. market
  • 62% of the audience sports content audience in the U.K. is male, compared to 57% in the U.S.

Sporting Events Audiences Correlates with Sponsors

  • Wimbledon.org: A core demographic of wealthy 25-34 year olds, with visitors more than 4 times as likely to also visit Rolex.com (index = 423)
  • UEFA.com: A relatively older audience who are over four times more likely than the average online European to visit Mastercard.com (index = 425)
  • FIFA.com: Twice the representation of 15-24 year olds than the average Internet site, and an affinity with Adidas-Solomon sites at more than eight times the global average (index = 840)

Consumption of Sports Content on Mobile Internet

  • Sports information is the third top genre on mobile in Western Europe
  • 5 million people in the U.K. accessed mobile sports information in July 2009, an increase of 56% since 2007. Similar to the PC-based Internet, activity increased during major sporting events, especially football

Conclusions
An expanding, increasingly engaged audience bodes well for companies investing in online sports content. New opportunities and challenges are constantly emerging, from the developing international markets and mobile platform, to the tantalizing prospects of the 2010 World Cup and 2012 Olympics. While the potential is huge, I can’t over-communicate the importance of an in-depth understanding of the behavior of consumers of sports content. The composition of audiences and their online behavior patterns vary by site and location. Moreover, such is the dynamism of the online world, audiences and the ways they engage with content are constantly changing and, without proper measurement, can be hard to follow, let alone predict.

But as the Internet evolves, so do the tools to we use to understand it. With the announcement of comScore Media Metrix 360, the next generation of global digital audience measurement was unveiled, combining the best of both worlds of panel and server-side measurement, bringing the marketplace a comprehensive accounting of the complete digital media universe. Furthermore, with technological and connectivity improvements driving mobile Internet growth, comScore’s partnership with the GSMA to create Mobile Media Metrics (MMM) represents a giant leap in our understanding of the mobile Internet – a crucial platform for sports content. With these developments, we can expect to see online advertising and sponsorship not only continue to grow, but to become increasingly effective, measurable, and accountable.

If you are interested in obtaining a copy of the full report, please visit our Presentation Library.

October 16, 2009


Can Newspapers Turn Sizable Online Audiences Into Profitable Ones?

Jay Leno included in one of his monologues recently a word of congratulation to the New York Times for being in business for 158 years. The punch line, however, was that he had read about the milestone on the Internet. Such is the state of the newspaper industry lately, as print editions struggle with eroding readership and advertising revenue, and online - while growing modestly - fails to fill the void on the more important metric of revenue. In an earlier post, I examined the growth in online newspaper site visitors relative to the decline in print readership audiences, and to what degree readers of the print edition are migrating to online newspaper sites for their news, either exclusively (i.e., they are becoming only online news readers) or as a complement to their print news reading.

Expanding on this news readership analysis, today I will examine three other dynamics facing newspaper organizations as they further evaluate their online strategies:

  • Losing News audiences to other sources of News and Information
  • Erosion of Classifieds audiences and revenues by Classifieds sites such as Craigslist
  • The threat posed by the emergence of local ESPN sites (e.g., ESPN Chicago)

Clearly, newspapers face much greater competition online for news and information than they did in an earlier time of three TV networks, local radio, and print newspapers. All of these legacy media are using the Internet as an alternative channel for distributing news; and the portals, as well as pure-play news sites, add to the competitive dynamic. The table below compares the year-over-year growth rate in unique visitors for a cross-section of News sites compared to the corresponding growth for the Newspaper category.

Visitation to News Sites and the Newspapers Category
August 2009 vs. August 2008
Total U.S. – Persons Age 2+
Source: comScore Media Metrix
 
Total Unique Visitors (000)
Aug-08
Aug-09
% Change
Newspapers
76,872
80,200
4.3%
Yahoo! News
44,268
47,260
6.8%
CNN
32,223
33,410
3.7%
AOL News
28,367
27,220
-4.0%
TMZ
10,450
16,384
56.8%
FoxNews.com
9,621
8,737
-9.2%
HuffingtonPost.com
3,293
5,425
64.8%

The Newspaper category growth holds up well against other digital news sites, however the growth at more niche-targeted sites like TMZ and Huffington Post cannot be ignored. The size of their audiences now compares favorably with some of the more prominent newspaper sites.

Meanwhile, Newspapers can expect to continue to get more pressure on the Sports front as ESPN introduces more locally-targeted sites. ESPN Chicago was the first to launch this summer, with ESPN Boston launched this month, and others in Dallas and Los Angeles to follow. ESPN Chicago has already surpassed the Chicago Tribune Sports section in monthly Unique Visitors.

Chicago Sports Site Visitation
August 2009
Total U.S. – Persons Age 2+
Source: comScore Media Metrix
 
Total Unique Visitors (000)
 
Aug-09
% of Site Visitors Also Visiting Other Site
Chicago Tribune Sports
414
21%
ESPN Chicago
701
12%
Visited Both
86
N/A

Interestingly, there is relatively little overlap (considering the similarity of the content) between the audiences of these two sites. Given the fact that the number of visitors to Chicago Tribune Sports has remained fairly constant since the introduction of ESPN Chicago, this would suggest that ESPN Chicago Visitors are not switching away from the Tribune Sports site. And, since 95% of ESPN Chicago Visitors also visit other parts of ESPN, this supports the theory that ESPN is building its local site’s audience from those people who are already visitors to ESPN. And this, in turn, reflects the power of the ESPN brand.

From the perspective of revenue generated from their print editions, newspapers have taken the greatest hit in classified advertising revenue as a result of competition from online classifieds sites, predominantly Craigslist but also from sites such as eBay. While Craigslist’s annual revenue is pegged at a modest $100 million (its services are free in many cities), it is estimated that classifieds revenue for print newspapers has declined from a peak of $20 billion in 2000 to approximately $10 million this year*. The size and growth of the Craigslist audience is compared below to the size and growth of the Newspapers category.

Visitation to Newspapers and Classified Categories
August 2009 vs. August 2008
Total U.S. – Persons 2+
Source: comScore Media Metrix
 
Total Unique Visitors (000)
Aug-08
Aug-09
% Change
Newspapers
76,872
80,200
4.3%
Classified
52,675
59,139
12.3%
Craigslist, Inc.
35,516
47,130
32.7%

The growth in visitors to the Classifieds category as a whole and Craigslist in particular outpaces the visitor growth for the Newspapers category. Additionally, over the last year Craigslist has become an even more formidable player in the Classifieds category. In August 2008, Craigslist accounted for 67% of category visitors, while by August 2009 Craigslist’s penetration of the category had increased to approximately 80 percent. What is most astounding, however, is the size of the Craigslist monthly audience as a percentage of the Newspapers category: by August 2009, Craigslist’s audience was 59% the size of the entire Newspapers category, and rivaled the audience of any individual Newspaper site.

Given the strong adoption of online Classifieds sites such as Craigslist, it is hard to imagine a scenario in which Classifieds revenue for newspapers returns to previous levels. Therefore, Newspapers sites must look for alternative ways to offset that revenue from other online sources. While it will be interesting to see how the recent discussions in the industry regarding the pay-for-content model unfold, Newspapers sites must also examine ways in which they can increase their display advertising revenue. While the size of the online audiences for many top newspaper sites are reasonable, engagement is lacking (the average visitor to a Newspaper site is only spending 24 minutes per month on the site), which limits these sites’ available inventory. Newspaper sites need to continue to look for ways to more deeply engage with the visitors they are attracting, while also measuring and promoting the unique value of their audiences so they can command higher premiums on the rates they charge advertisers for reaching their audiences.

* E-Commerce Times, "Craigslist on a Tear as Newspaper Classifieds Wither”, June 2009.


October 21, 2009


comScore Wins 2009 Chicago Innovation Award

Last night comScore was a proud recipient of the Chicago Innovation Awards, which celebrates the creative spirit of the Chicago region by recognizing and honoring the city’s most innovative new products and services. comScore was selected as a winner of the prestigious award, along with nine other companies from a pool of more than 250 submissions, for Ad Effx, an innovative tool for measuring the offline and online sales impact of online advertising – even if there are no clicks on the ads themselves. This solution is helping prove the sales ROI of online advertising campaigns and helping attract brand-building advertising dollars over to the digital medium.

Chicago Innovation Awards

The award ceremony was held at Chicago’s historic Goodman Theater and was hosted by the very entertaining duo and co-founders of the Chicago Innovation Awards Tom Kuczmarski, president of Kuczmarski & Associates, and Dan Miller, executive vice president of the Heartland Association. The two kicked off the festivities joining in a hip-hop dance routine with local dance group Stick & Move which met with raucous applause. Chicago Mayor Richard Daley also addressed the audience underscoring the importance of innovation in building a vibrant city and business community that creates opportunities and jobs for so many. With today’s economic headwinds and an unemployment rate of almost 10%, the jobs created by innovators and entrepreneurs are vital to the rebuilding of the U.S. economy.

Chicago Innovation Awards

The main program consisted of the awards presentation to the ten honorees, which included innovative companies across industries and disciplines: Groupon.com, EveryBlock.com, AirCell, RescueVac, Suncast, Tripp-Lite, Robotic Assisted Surgery @ UIC Med Center, Visible Vote and the Modern Wing of the Art Institute of Chicago. The winners of the award were also recently featured in BusinessWeek.

The evening concluded with an illuminating keynote address by Leo Melamed, known as the founder of financial futures and Chairman Emeritus of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Group, which highlighted Chicago’s unique history of innovation and global leadership.

The Chicago Innovation Awards was a terrific event that showed the creativity, brilliance and spirit of innovation that makes Chicago such a special city, and comScore was honored to be a part of it.

October 26, 2009


Forget the “Click” – How the Click-Thru Metric is Holding Back Digital Media Spend

I recently spoke at ad:Tech London about online advertising effectiveness and addressed the topic of how online display ad effectiveness compares to that of TV. One recent comScore study revealed that the view-through impact of online display ads can have the same impact on sales as what has traditionally been ascribed to TV ads. Unfortunately, measuring the performance of display ads based on the immediate click-thru metric is still a widely accepted practice in the world of digital media, and it is a practice that can have significant negative repercussions for each participant in the online advertising value chain. Worse still, if online ad revenue is meant to be driven by brand advertisers (as opposed to the direct response advertisers that first used the Internet as a marketing channel), clinging to the click won’t add any value to these brand marketers, and they’ll continue to put money where they always have.

Since ad:Tech London, the advertiser, agency, and publisher communities have offered extremely interesting feedback on our findings about the latent impact of display ads. Let’s take a quick look at the main issues in continuing to use click-thru from each perspective in the advertising value chain:

Publishers – In a tough economic climate, and amidst continuing declines in click-thru rates (Doubleclick revealed the average stood at 0.08% for U.K. campaigns at the end of 2008), how is it possible to maintain display ad price rates when the metric you’re being judged by is wholly inappropriate? The result is that rates continue to decline as savvy marketers drive hard bargains for valuable inventory by beating up publishers with click-thru data against their own required cost per acquisition targets.

Agencies – As the guardians of advertising strategy, planning, and buying, agencies’ credibility is on the line when recommending digital over traditional media. Agencies know online works, but the click-thru metric doesn’t help them prove why or validate getting the justified increase in share of budget for online advertising. It misses all of the positive things that consumers subsequently do in the days and weeks following exposure to an ad.

Advertisers – As the world’s largest advertisers make decisions to optimize their media spend, (which becomes harder and harder in the face of increased pressure on budgets), marketers are being forced by the click-thru metric to conclude that any display ad not clicked on is wasted money. The old maxim states that 50% of traditional media ad budget is wasted, and online in the U.K. we are saying that 99.92% of display budget is wasted? Based on that simplistic thinking, I know where I’d invest!

The future of measuring display ad effectiveness has to be by considering view-thru, incorporating consumer behavior over time rather than just clicks. View-thru metrics meet the increased demand for accountability that the Internet faces over any other media, and combines this with an unparalleled relevancy that other metrics just don’t achieve. Marketers will finally have an understanding of what consumers are doing, not just saying, in the days and weeks after seeing display ads, and have an understanding of the volume of search activity that is being driven by display ad exposure.

We know that the global online population is using the Internet for more reasons than ever before. It’s interesting to think that now there are young generations growing up online, whose idea of a travel agent or financial advisor being a real person (rather than a website) is completely alien. In order to communicate with these consumers in the future, companies will need to invest more of their marketing budget online, and this necessitates a more thorough understanding of how online advertising works than the click can ever provide.

comScore will soon be releasing aggregated results for the European market regarding how display ads work over time, and our preliminary results suggest an even larger impact than we’ve seen in the U.S. I think you’ll find the detailed analysis quite illuminating.


October 28, 2009


Collegiate Entrepreneurs Offer Hope for Long-Term Economic Recovery

This past Saturday, I was invited back to speak at this year’s annual conference of the Collegiate Entrepreneurs’ Association (CEO) in Chicago’s McCormick Place. CEO was founded in 1997 by Dr. Gerry Hills, then an entrepreneurial professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, who had worked tirelessly since 1983 to establish the organization. CEO’s vision is to be the premier global entrepreneurship network which will serve 30,000 students, through 400 chapters and affiliated student organizations at colleges and universities. Today, 150 universities and colleges from across the country are members of CEO.

This year, there were 1,500 students attending the conference, about the same number as last year. That was an encouraging reflection, in and of itself, of the appeal of being an entrepreneur. I suspect, however, that the interest among undergrads in being an entrepreneur is also stimulated by the bleak conditions in the job market. So, while in my talk I communicated some of the lessons I have learned along the way in building successful businesses at Management Science Associates, IRI and now comScore, I also made sure I stressed the importance of entrepreneurs and small businesses in creating jobs. I would go as far as to say that small businesses represent the engine of job creation. And, in fact, today small businesses are more important than ever as the U.S. struggles with a high and rising unemployment level. John Mauldin, my favorite economist, pointed out in one of his recent newsletters the magnitude of the challenge we are facing:

“The first element is Rising Unemployment. There has never been a sustained inflationary period without wage inflation. Wages are basically flat and falling. With 9.8% unemployment, 7% underemployed (temporary), and another 3-4% off the radar screen because they are so discouraged they are not even looking for jobs, and thus are not counted as unemployed (who made up these rules?), it is hard to see how wage inflation is in our near future. Think about this. Only a few years ago, less than 1 in 16 Americans was unemployed or underemployed. Today it is 1 in 5. That is a staggering, overwhelming statistic. Mind-numbing.”

Based on these ugly statistics, it’s readily apparent how important the role of entrepreneurship has become today in creating new jobs and helping get our economy back on track.

So, last Saturday, I took the opportunity to wish the members of CEO who are next year’s new graduates every success as they pursue their dream of creating their own businesses, because it’s clear that the realization of their entrepreneurial dreams could represent the cornerstone of an economic recovery.


About October 2009

This page contains all entries posted to comScore Voices in October 2009. They are listed from oldest to newest.

September 2009 is the previous archive.

November 2009 is the next archive.

Subscribe


Authors


Recent Posts


Archives